5th January 2004 · Last updated: 5th October 2016
Here's my latest demo: CSS Pencils. It proves you can use CSS to create anything! Yes it's insane, but I hope you like it.
Comments are locked on this topic. Thanks to everyone who posted a comment.
wow that's insane.. it did take quite some time to load on my IE6 even that i'm on T1 connection
Posted on 5 January 2004 at 10:10 pm ¶
Amazing! ;=) That's all I got to say.
Posted on 6 January 2004 at 3:08 am ¶
It's insane, but it's also just gorgeous!
Posted on 6 January 2004 at 1:51 pm ¶
I can't believe you've only gotten three comments on this thus far... but that's the most crazy insane piece of CSS I've ever seen! Madness, sheer madness! Congratulations!
Posted on 6 January 2004 at 8:21 pm ¶
thats pretty f****** amazing
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 6:52 pm ¶
just out of curiositiy, did you use
or something similar to create the html (you can using something like html tidy to conver the html which that page creates to xhtml)
so it wouldnt need much more changing to create the page you made.
just a thought.
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 6:57 pm ¶
You are insane. Go to Bill Gates and demand for a job in the IE development (if it exist somehow) department. If he refuses. God help his soul.
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 7:09 pm ¶
- Big John:
Apparently Chris hand coded this monster. If he wasn't mad before he is now. Woohoo!
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 8:05 pm ¶
- Chris Hester:
"just out of curiositiy, did you use http://www.sebastian-r.de/asciiart/ or something similar to create the html"
No, never seen that site before. The first version of the demo used PHP to read in all the image data line by line, from a text file. It then converted it into CSS. If I tell you how I got the image into RGB values you'd probably laugh, or call for the men in white coats.
Once I had the data, PHP was used to change it, initially on the fly, into the filters you see. I had a lot more filters before, such as 10 levels of zoom, and a weird water effect that came about by accident.
For the final demo I went back to this version to generate the CSS, which was then saved out as separate stylesheets.
Ideally you could have a routine that takes any image and converts it to CSS. But that's beyond me at the moment.
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 8:07 pm ¶
that's amazing! it take a while to load on my computer..but the result was incredible! GREAT JOB!
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 11:19 pm ¶
- Stu Nicholls:
You must have the patience of a saint to create such a picture.
I have been playing around with pure css art on my web site but nothing as adventurous as this.
You could almost have done this down to a pixel level. A css masterpiece!
Posted on 7 January 2004 at 11:31 pm ¶
You are the god of CSS, all our CSS are belong to you.
When I first put up my blog and realized the power of CSS I was inspired. It fascinated me that I could control things right down to the pixel. But your demo has inspired me to a new level.
Posted on 8 January 2004 at 2:40 am ¶
amazing work! simply wonderful...
Posted on 8 January 2004 at 8:20 am ¶
yeah... i can't belive it...
Posted on 9 January 2004 at 9:30 pm ¶
*is utterly speechless*
Posted on 10 January 2004 at 11:29 am ¶
- Chris Hester:
Related post on Dodo's Message Board:
Posted on 11 January 2004 at 11:04 pm ¶
Makes me think that someone somewhere could set up some program to output the divs.
Excellent work, makes people think.
Posted on 12 January 2004 at 4:19 pm ¶
- Chris Hester:
Shit. I am owned.
Thanks to Eric Meyer for mentioning the site and Tantek Çelik for forwarding me the link.
Posted on 13 January 2004 at 8:39 pm ¶
- Nicholas Liu:
I know nothing about CSS, but I know that that's fucking amazing. Wow.
Posted on 16 January 2004 at 11:04 am ¶
that's amazing. i can't begin to wrap my mind around what it would take to code that.
Posted on 16 January 2004 at 8:38 pm ¶
Hmm. I see nothing with Moz 1.6 but it looks awsome with IE6.
Posted on 17 January 2004 at 2:26 am ¶
By the way, the css version loaded quickly on a fast DSL line and displayed flawlessly in Firebird 0.6.1 in Win2KPro-SP4 on a 300Mhz Celeron laptop with 288MB RAM and a 97% full hard drive! This is absolutely f***ing amazing! I am throughly stunned! Nice work!
Posted on 17 January 2004 at 4:32 am ¶
You are a both a lunatic and an inspiration. Awesome, man, completely awesome.
Posted on 17 January 2004 at 9:34 pm ¶
- Chris Hester:
I find the demo is now broken in Mozilla 1.6 final. Anyone know what is happening? The height of each 'pixel' is extended, leading to the image carrying on at the bottom.
Posted on 17 January 2004 at 10:20 pm ¶
- Cameron Adams:
Chris, I hope you didn't go through Photoshop and manually record the RGB values using the eye dropper :o]
You could probably have got a converter that outputs the image as a text-based RGB format.
Posted on 19 January 2004 at 2:36 am ¶
- Chris Ruzin:
I noticed that in Mozilla 1.6 on the Mac, the v2 image doesn't show up at all. But in Mozilla 1.6 on Yellow Dog Linux, it does. Has anyone else noticed this?
The v3 image works amazingly on Mozilla 1.6 on YDL as well. The filters are lightning fast. And this is on an old Powerbook Pismo with only 192MB RAM.
The v1 image works too, but is much slower at redrawing with the filters, as mentioned by the author.
Posted on 20 January 2004 at 12:47 am ¶
- Amit Karmakar:
Awesome Chris! WOW! Pretty impressive.
Posted on 20 January 2004 at 12:28 pm ¶
Gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "mad genius"!! Now...how to put it to practical use...? Gotta have one of those auto-div-generators
But it doesn't need to be practical when it's this astonishing.
Posted on 20 January 2004 at 2:56 pm ¶
- Chris Hester:
Fixed the problem with Mozilla 1.6/Win.
Posted on 20 January 2004 at 8:53 pm ¶
- Ryan Saghir:
Wow.. that's simply incredible. You're one sick person! Great work.
Posted on 21 January 2004 at 3:57 am ¶
this is just *great*, i wish a div generator existed - overcaffeinated psycho php coding, anyone?
Posted on 22 January 2004 at 4:43 pm ¶
If you have the GD image manipulation library installed on your web server (I don't, so you'll have to copy it somewhere else to use it), http://jjjb.net/test/csspic/index.php.txt should generate divs for you.
Instructions (of a kind) are included in the source.
Posted on 25 January 2004 at 9:50 pm ¶
Ooooohmigod... this is Brain Breaking! STUNNING!
Only took a few seconds on a Win XP with IE6.0
Posted on 27 January 2004 at 7:22 pm ¶
This is sick, disturbing, and brilliant... I can hardly wait for the "CSS Output" option on my favorite paint program
Posted on 28 January 2004 at 4:11 pm ¶
Amazing! Could this technique be used to dynamically generate correctly-sized rounded box corners with PHP? That would be awesome if it could do that.
Posted on 29 January 2004 at 5:29 am ¶
- Chris Hester:
Yes that would be a good idea. The code would be small too. You could also add transparency taking into account the background colour to give the same effect as PNGs, only it would work in all main browsers!
Posted on 29 January 2004 at 10:42 am ¶
Very cool (all 3 versions) in Mozilla 1.7a/Win2K.
For grins I tried Netscape Navigator 4.08, and version 1.1 worked, except it was slow, the bottom 1/4 of the image was stretched, and the effects mostly worked, but it wasn't too pretty about it. Version 2.1 displayed the pencils, again with the bottom 1/4 stretched, but none of the effects worked, and version 3.1 displayed a blank page.
Posted on 16 March 2004 at 4:17 am ¶
Posted on 17 March 2004 at 3:28 pm ¶
- Andrew Wooldridge:
That's simply amazing. Imagine combining this technique with the 5k wolfenstein demo:
You could have a tiny screen/video game
Also, in case folks are interested, there is another way to draw images to the browser without resorting to external image files:
you can create images that have a data: url instead of http and url encode the whole thing into the page itself. see here for more information http://segment7.net/ruby-code/datafy/datafy.html
Posted on 19 March 2004 at 4:47 pm ¶
- Richard Thompson:
that is AMAZING
Posted on 16 April 2004 at 2:57 pm ¶
very impressive. it'd be interesting to do filesize comparisons between the CSS implementation and the original image. and more thoroughly investigate the implications of your achievement............
Posted on 3 May 2004 at 9:56 pm ¶
I think someone is in desperate need of sex.
Posted on 4 May 2004 at 6:12 pm ¶
WOW. That is awesome!!!!
Posted on 13 May 2004 at 11:51 pm ¶
1) The bad news: You're insane.
2) The good news: You're onto something big. The W3C intelligensia might not like this. :)
Well seriously, I think it's pretty cool and it is possibly the future, maybe, maybe not. One excellent application I can recommend to you is to use your technique to create rounded corners for divs and tables. I am so tired of having to use little graphics for corners.
Definitely you could get a job at like PARC or MS or something advanced like that, where you can get to play all you want with divs.
Posted on 17 May 2004 at 8:21 pm ¶
- Ansonet bros:
lright on mate.
we were looking how to embed imgs in CSS and bumped into u :)
We salute you in honour of your creation, and the commitment of hard crimes against any image-related sanity!
Posted on 25 May 2004 at 12:19 pm ¶
that's simply bigger than a gif
Posted on 16 June 2004 at 6:21 pm ¶
- Jessica Deprez:
This is outstanding! It must've taken you so long to create this. It may be a while before this is regularly implemented (because we all know an image will work on the web.. you never know when a certain 'exploding' browser will not :\ ), but it's another big step in the CSS creating community :) Many kudos!
Posted on 14 July 2004 at 5:40 pm ¶
Are you telling me you made 1492 css "id"s to create a picture of some pencil heads ? Try a jpg next time, much easier
Posted on 20 July 2004 at 1:15 am ¶